An interesting case has recently been handed down from the Courts. This case now provides Parents with the rights to strip their children of inheritances. The judgment goes against what was previously believed good law.
To date, we have all thought that parents owe a duty to their children to provide for them in some way upon their deaths. The Courts have been littered with cases where children have brought claims against the estates of their parents when their parents failed to leave them a little something...
By and large the Courts have been sympathetic and have awarded children something out of their parent’s estates, even, in some cases, stating parents have a duty to provide for their children, irrespective of the child’s age.
Well that reasoning may go by the board if the latest case is anything to go by.
The Case
The case goes something like this. Dad, mum and two daughters lived happily together but when mum died and left her estate to dad, the two daughters fought over the estate. The result was the daughters ended up with $56,000 whilst dad received $20,000. The ultimate outcome however was the daughters fell out with their dad. This is a huge cost – far more than the money involved that’s for sure.
Dad decided that he would place his affairs with the Public Trust and so he completed a Will in which he left nothing to his daughters. He also left instructions with the Public Trust that they were not to tell his daughters about his death, his funeral or his Will.
Dad’s statement to the Public Trust went along the lines that his daughters gave him nothing, not even respect and that is what he intended to give them on his death - Nothing.
When Dad died the Public Trust actioned his instructions. Herein lies the problem. No death notice was published. The Public Trust did however advertise for creditors of the estate to come forward but none ever did. This is standard policy when dealing with a personal estate.
The Public Trust did not inform the daughters and the estate, valued at circa $250,000, was passed to his de facto partner, in accordance with the Deceases wishes expressed in his Will.
The eldest daughter, learned of her father’s death, about two years after the event. Two years is a long time in legal beagle land and time had run out for her and her sister to lodge a claim against her father’s estate. This however didn’t deter her. Instead, she sued the Public Trust, citing they had a legal duty to advise her of her father’s death. If she won the claim, she would likely received approximately $62,000.
The Judgment
The Court however didn’t quite see the daughter’s side of the story. Instead they issued a judgment stating that executors (the Public Trust in this particular case) did not have a general duty to inform potential claimants about a death or even a general duty to advertise for claimants. Rather, executors have a duty to tell a person only when they know that person wishes to make a claim. So, executors have to have actual knowledge of a potential claim rather than pre-supposing someone might make a claim.
The Court finished up by saying that the Public Trust did not have actual knowledge that the daughter would make a claim and therefore, was not liable.
Lessons for Us All to Learn
So what does all this mean for parents and children?
Well to start with, we want all families to play together and stay together. The emotional cost of falling out with each other is huge.
Secondly, we would like to see all assets held in a Trust not in a person’s personal name and personal legal capacity. Why? Because Trust assets can be passed from Trust to Trust meaning they can be passed from a parent’s Trust to a Trust established for their children upon that parent’s death. This protects those assets from creditors and the Official Assignee and of course, negates gift duty.
Thirdly, everyone should have an up to date Memorandum of Wishes. This document will tell your surviving Trustees what you want done with the assets of the Trust when you are dead.
Lastly, everyone should have a current Will which deals with the assets that you do actually hold in your personal name at the time of your death, such as tools, jewellery, etc.
Of course, asking your parents what they intend to do with your inheritance is often a difficult subject to broach. A way of opening up this type of discussion with your parents is to tell your parents what you intend to do with your own assets for your own children. Alternatively, you could always watch our DVD on the subject with your own parents and discuss the matter after looking at the DVD. It can be a difficult topic of conversation but there are ways to handle it and as always, open communication is the best policy.
One of the lessons to be taken from this case is if you want to protect the inheritances you are going to receive from your parents and if you want to protect the inheritances you intend to leave to your own children, ensure you take action.
Don’t leave assets in your personal names but put them into Trust and ensure you have current Memorandum of Wishes and Wills in place. Also make sure you have a good discussion with your parents about the topic and get them to transfer their assets to a Trust, later to be transferred on their death to your own Trust.
As always, if I can be of help with any of these conversations, just let me know. You can request an interview for a no obligation and confidential chat.
Professional Trustee Services
Gilligan Rowe + Associates Ltd
Chartered Accountants
Learn more about Janet
Email: jx@gra.co.nz
Ph: +64 9 522 7955
P.S. Did you like this article? Go ahead and sign up to our free newsletter and receive tips, updates and useful information to help you protect your assets and grow your net worth. GRA are accountants who provide expert accountant advice both in NZ and offshore.
P.P.S. Check out our sister website, www.familytrusts.co.nz for more family trust information.
____________________________________________
Last week a friend of mine unexpectedly passed away. 
Last week, Bill English delivered the first budget of the National Government. In it, he confirmed the deferral of the planned personal tax cuts in 2010 and 2011. This came as no surprise to many. 
As I have said on several occasions, property and stock markets react much faster than local businesses to the bad news. 
www.on.co.nz