Those of you who are knowledgeable about the NZ mortgage landscape may have heard in the past about Resimac’s Specialist Investor Product. This offered a great longer-term solution for those who wanted to hold investment properties but couldn’t meet overly cautious bank affordability criteria.
While this product left the market a while back, the initial signs are that it may have been replaced by something even better.
While we are still working through some test cases, indications are that there is a new competitively priced product which will be very useful for the investor whose equity position is strong but is held back because of how the banks look at their cashflow.
To explain further: as an investor grows their portfolio, there becomes a larger and larger gap between reality, i.e. how an investor will look at their cashflow, and how a bank does.
Why is that?
The banks tend to scale the rental income to circa 75% of what is received. Then on the mortgage side, they assess everything at considerably higher interest rates (currently assessed at circa 7%). On top of that, even though the investor may have their mortgages on interest-only, they will always be assessed as if the investor is paying principal and interest.
Example – bank vs investor cashflow assessment
Let’s say an investor (we’ll call him John) built a portfolio where he had the following:
• $3.5m of investment property returning a gross yield of 5% ($175k)
• Annual non-mortgage costs of $50k for running the portfolio
• $2m of debt at a 5% interest rate on an interest-only basis
• All debt taken on a 30-year term and was 10 years into the term (i.e. there were 20 years remaining).
The difference between John’s view and the bank’s view is roughly as follows:
What happens for most investors is that they cover the bank’s negative view of their portfolio’s cashflow from their other income streams. Then as their portfolio grows, most tend to eventually hit a ‘servicing’ wall.
What this new product allows is the ability to look at a property on a stand-alone basis and disregard the remainder of the customer’s position.
There are some other rules around this that need to be noted. For instance, generally the funder will look at the entity and how it stacks up. If this proves to be a hurdle, having access to an expert asset structuring firm such as Gilligan Rowe & Associates may provide solutions.
Example – how the new lending formula works
So, let’s say part of John’s portfolio was a $600,000 property that was rented for $700 per week. If other criteria could be met, the way this non-bank lender would view this as follows:
(Rental x 80%) > (mortgage amount on principal and interest x interest rate + 1%)
As this looks confusing, let’s put some more numbers in. The interest rate that John would be charged in this case is likely to be 6.29% (likely dropping to 6.04% after this week’s cash review).
This means that the formula is:
$3031 (monthly rent) x 80% = $2,425
$2,425 has to be more than the mortgage cost on a principal and interest basis with a 1% loading added.
By jumping onto our mortgage calculator at https://www.krispedersen.co.nz/calculator/ and putting in an interest rate of 7.29% (1% more than the interest rate being charged) and then playing around with the loan amount, it can be seen that the maximum loan amount is circa $353k.

Summary
Keep in mind other criteria must be satisfied, but with this product it is possible to get a long-term mortgage at rates close to a bank floating rate when otherwise the investor may be locked out of the market.
If you would like to discuss this further or have any questions, please contact Kris Pedersen here.
This letter is to express my appreciation for the assistance and encouragement of both Anthony Lipscombe and particularly John Heaslip over the last financial year. The period since activating my trading trust has been one of considerable stress, as well as personal development, as I embarked on this as a relative business neophyte with virtually no awareness of the contemporary requirements of running a business, particularly the financial records aspect. During much of this period I have therefore felt considerable out of my depth. However I have been lucky enough to have had the benefit of the advice and support of John Heaslip in rationalizing what was a fairly chaotic set of records of the first year property trading. I am able to say that John in particular, has been unstinting in his attention to my needs and has done so in a manner which has never alluded to my extremely rudimentary grasp of managing a business, or even of being unable to set out a spread sheet properly. The result of the above guidance is that now, although my trading trust would still not be able to operate without the advice of GRA, I do least feel a sense of satisfaction that I have got to my present point without major disaster and that my property trust does now have some kind of firmer basis for any future activities - Name withheld by request

Gilligan Rowe and Associates is a chartered accounting firm specialising in property, asset planning, legal structures, taxation and compliance.
We help new, small and medium property investors become long-term successful investors through our education programmes and property portfolio planning advice. With our deep knowledge and experience, we have assisted hundreds of clients build wealth through property investment.
Learn More